From ConservativeAction.org:

Dear Editor...

George Primbs, Director of Operations for the Clinton Investigative Commission, has been confronting the Clinton-bias in the media. The folloing is a sampling of CIC letters

7-9-97

Editor
Washington Post

Bill Clinton has wimped-out again.

In his choice for countries to be admitted to the NATO alliance, he has made "safe" choices on which nations to admit. NATO expansion offends the Russians. It is a sign of the imperialist west invading their "buffer zone."

NATO has never meant to be an invading force. It was a safeguard measure meant to protect member countries from the Soviet aggression. Do not believe for one moment that since the USSR is defunct that now Russians are no longer belligerently aggressive. Ask the Baltic states Estonia, Latvia, or Lithuania whom Clinton has sold out for Russia's appeasement.

Sincerely,

George Primbs

Back To Top


7-9-97

Editor
The New American
PO Box 8040
Appleton, WI 54913

Bill Clinton continues to propagate neo-fascism upon the American people, not for the reasons of raising national prominence; rather, Clinton seeks to create for himself a new cult of personality. Clinton wants desperately to have a footnote placed by his name in the great book of history, and if subjugating the people at large will attain this goal, then so be it. For the greater good, naturally.

Sincerely,

George Primbs

Back To Top


7-9-97

Editors
The Washington Monthly
1611 Connecticut Ave. NW
Washington DC 20009

Why is it that Clinton wants to penalize the wealthy on their taxes? Well, frankly, that is where the money is, right? No, the real money is in the middle classes, but we don't want to scare the middle class. We all know the drill, that Republicans pit the middle class against the poor, Democrats the rich. So Clinton and his liberal buddies decide to pit the middle class against the rich. The rich are evil, they live better than you, they eat strange things like ‘Brie', and drive better cars than you, but that's not where he's going to get the money.

All the while Bill has really been targeting your wallet. You have just been diverted by a convenient distraction provided for you by his slick-ness.

Sincerely,

George Primbs

Back To Top


7-17-97

Editor Yeas & Nays
George
1633 Broadway
New York, NY 10019

If one is to believe the article on Janet Reno was meant to give depth to this automaton of the Clinton regime, then one must be smoking crack. (Wild Thing by Mark Johnson July 14, 1997.) Clinton has placed the Justice Department in a very good set of hands, at least from his perspective. No longer will Clinton be pestered by such gauche intrusions like a special investigator asking embarrassing questions; like where'd the money go? Clinton is now free to pursue his almighty, "legacy." Thanks Janet.

Sincerely,

George Primbs

Back To Top


7-17-97

Insight
Correspondence Editor
3600 New York Ave. NE
Washington DC 20002

The matter of control the Mr. Ginsburg had over his portfolio is irrelevant. (Ruth Bader Ginsburg Fails to Recuse Herself by John Berlau July 28 1997) The quick of the argument is that another Clinton administration appointee ,and now Justice, has been implicated in another moneymaking scandal; shocking isn't it?

Nevertheless, the statute stands that there should not be even a mere whiff of impropriety, yet Ginsburg continued to work the cases as they came. There are only two scenarios which could be true; 1) Ginsburg with full knowledge of the federal statute is guilty of failing to recuse herself. 2) She is completely ignorant of the most basic points of federal statutes; unlikely one doesn't get too far in Washington DC by being ignorant.

Sincerely,

George Primbs

Back To Top


7-17-97

Editors
The New Republic
1220 19th St. NW
Washington DC 20036

If are to assume that the Watergate fiasco which ripped Nixon out of office was orchestrated from the White House. (Following the Money by the Editors TNR 07-28-97)Why then is it so implausible that the direction of foreign and illegal campaign funds were not channeled and managed by Clinton at the Presidential mansion? Is he above suspicion?

Even if the moneys involved were funneled to the DNC, and not directly to Bill, then it still leaves a trail of corruption that will ultimately lead back to Clinton's own election campaign. Don't say that Clinton wasn't an appealing target to foreign governments seeking influence. The DNC is hurting economically, and at the time, Bill Clinton was unpopular in the polls; he had every reason to channel cash into the DNC, and; hence back to himself.

Sincerely,

George Primbs

Back To Top


7-17-97

Letters Editor
Wall Street Journal
200 Liberty St.
New York, NY 10281

With President Clinton seeking his legacy, he has yet again invaded somebody else's victory. ( Clinton Targets Penalties Big Tobacco Would Pay if Youth Smoking Persists by Hillary Stout July 15, 1997) Bill Clinton is trying to steal the issue away for no greater reason than his legacy.

President had no part in the success of the suit, but typically wants to now be perceived as part of the winning side so that he might be favorably remembered.

Sincerely,

George Primbs

Back To Top


7-17-97

The Washington Times
3600 New York Ave.
Washington DC 20002

Dear Editor,

With the Senatorial democrats conceding to Thompson's assertions that China has funneled money to subvert the election process, Clinton has lost powerful allies. (Democrats concede China funding plot, Agree Thompson has proof by Mary Ann Akers July 16, 1997) Clinton and his administration have tried to block the progression of any possible investigation into these matters. This sabotage by Clinton has even invaded the objectiveness of the mainstream media. No major media outlet has yet to fully even recognize the seriousness of these proceedings.

Sincerely,

George Primbs

Back To Top


7-20-97

Harper's Magazine

To the Editor,

For Bill Clinton to sell access to the highest levels of the White House is no great surprise, so when he sells access to our nations greatest national treasures why are we so surprised? ( the Federal Chainsaw Massacre by Paul Roberts June 1997) The truth is that we should expect it. Bill willingly commits the atrocities against those poor spotted owls that would have environmentalists howling if he came from a different political party.

Sincerely,

George Primbs

Back To Top


7-20-97

Insight on the News

To the editor,

The fun continues on as Janet Reno tries to defend the notion that there is no need for a special prosecutor , even as the director of the FBI Louie Freeh is screaming for one. (Time to Freeh Janet Reno by Jaime Dettmer & Timothy Maier August 4th..) The most probable reason that Reno will not employ a special prosecutor is that she likes her job, and to continue on in her current position she has sold her soul to Clinton.

Sincerely,

George Primbs

Back To Top


7-20-97

Time Magazine

To the Editor,

The hearings, much to the disappointment of President Clinton, are far from over. (Connect the Dots Michael Weisskopf July 28) The infamous Mr. Huang was more than a mere bumbling money boy, he was more likely a top agent in the Chinese employ. The rapid track that Mr. Huang was moving along is most likely the doing of Bill Clinton. Eager to get money from "soft" and other sources such as the Lippo Group, Clinton sold a position at the Commerce department to Mr. Huang so that he could return to fulfill his important "legacy."

For their money, the Chinese were able to have their operative invade the Commerce Department and as an extra bonus they got to work inside the belly of the beast; the Democratic National Committee, tainting a currently unimaginable number of Democratic politicians.

Sincerely,

George Primbs

Back To Top


7-20-97

The Wall Street Journal

To the Editor

Most can remember the lessons on how politics can make strange bedfellows. (Unpredictable Nature of Medicare Politics Leaves Congress Worried as Decision Time Approaches by Christopher Georges July 21.) How true this is, Clinton has the Republicans jittery over the upcoming Medicare issue. They have a right to be. Bill Clinton who said upon numerous occasions that he supports reforms within the current system. It is only too bad that he doesn't mean it.

The Republicans, befuddled as Clinton backed out and the elderly descended to rip apart the Republican leadership left on the sacrificial altar. Bill Clinton frolicked in the approval ratings. He was the man who saved Medicare from the mean-spirited Republicans slash and burn reforms. The very reforms that Bill Clinton fully supported once upon a time.

Sincerely,

George Primbs

Back To Top


8-4-97

Editor,
Gentleman's Quarterly
Conde Nast Publications
New York, NY 10017

To the Editor,

Bill Clinton making a profit off American people is no great surprise, but the American people trying to make a profit off President Clinton may prove to be more difficult. (Bill Clinton Slept Here by David Kamp August 4, 1997.) Clinton's selling of interests to various foreign and domestic interests come as no surprise these days. A more profitable way for the people of Arkansas to make money off Clinton is to organize statewide Bill-Clinton-slept-with-me-here tours.

Sincerely,

George Primbs

Back To Top


8-4-97

Editor,
Newsweek
251 West 57th St.
New York, NY 10019

To the Editor,

With the discovery of another woman claiming harassment, Bill Clinton could be in serious trouble.("A twist in Jones v. Clinton" by Michael Isikoff 8-11-97.) But Clinton already knows this, that's why he has put up such a fight all the way to the Supreme Court. The Clinton administration knows that they can't dismiss the claims of Jones as just another bimbo, not without serious collateral damage to their President. And with the additional new claim from Ms. Wiley that then Gov. Clinton had harassed her as well, the President would be on his way to receiving another title: Philanderer-in-Chief.

Sincerely,

George Primbs

Back To Top


September 19, 1997

Editor,
The American Spectator
2020 North 14th Street, Suite 750
Arlington, Virginia 22201-2515

To the Editor,

The Clinton's new scandal-du-jour, is no surprise really. (The Clinton's brewing Micro-Scandal, by Byron York, September 1997.) After Whitewater, Foster, and other assorted shennigans the majority of the public doesn't can't take the Resident of the White House U.S. as credible any longer. But one must wonder how can any politician as shady as Clinton, and his wife, keep getting away with making a profit from public office?

Mrs. Clinton and her plan to use the FDIC to steer billions of dollars to her husband's supporters is Machiavellian in nature, ingenious but evil; heck, Machiavelli would have been imprisoned and tortured for such an act. But apparently the Clintons have a, "get-out-of-scandal-free," card; something for which Lyndon Johnson would have killed his own best friend to obtain, but unlike Bill, apparently didn't.

Sincerely,

George Primbs

Back To Top


Sept. 19, 1997

Editor,
The New Republic
1220 19th St. NW
Washington, DC 20036

To the Editor,

One suspects that the failure of true democracy in Haiti fulfills a certain liberal tendency towards "benign despotism." ("Failing Haiti: American Illusions Meet Caribbean Reality," by Charles Lane, Sept. 29, 1997.)

Since the advent of The New Republic writers such as Walter Lippmann and his successors have tended to treat each hiccup by democracy as a signal to rally behind-the-scenes, self-appointed elites to impose some ad hoc policy.

And the descendants of that tradition find fault with Haitian-style democracy!

The 23,000 troops which invaded Haiti have worked tiny miracles and contributed a positive legacy. Undoing their work means, eventually, installing a bastardized regime perhaps unifying both new and old Haitian elites mediated by a high-tech voodoo police state. May God forbid it.

While we at the Clinton Investigative Commission obviously did not urge this Administration to send American troops to "nation-build" Haiti, neither do we want to throw away actual gains, even if not of our design.

Orchids do not spring from a field whose soil has been eroded for 200 years, but the soil for democracy in Haiti has been turned and the results have been mixed.

Give the US Armed Forces under the direction of the Clinton White House credit for at least having made a ghastly situation into a bad one. Thanks to American troops the America's as a whole are closer to that day when a democratic flower blossoms in our neighbor's renovated fields.

Sincerely,

George Primbs

Back To Top


September 25,1997

Editor,
Time Inc.
Time & Life Building, Rockefeller Center
New York, NY 10020-1393

To the Editor,

Janet Reno, outraged? Because reporters got the story first? (Reno's New focus, by Richard Lacayo, Sept. 29, 1997.) I think not.

The Attorney General has had plenty of opportunity to administer justice in the Clinton capers. Reno painted her self portrait repeatedly using the oils of "learned helplessness." And now, "outraged" by the free press, the AG continues to spread oil on troubled waters.

Miss Reno's continuing evasions deliver what money cannot buy: more time for the White House to manipulate or misplace evidence, "forget" incidents, and handle "eruptions." All the while the very passage of time weakens the memories and credibility of eyewitnesses who happen to survive being handled.

Sincerely,

George Primbs

Back To Top


CIC Defends the Washington Post?
February 27, 1998

Letter to the Editor:

Recent reports that Washington Post writer Susan Schmidt is being targeted by Hillary Clinton and other White House officials should raise the ire of all journalists. Ms. Schmidt has been forthright in her reporting; she has written stories critical of those on both sides of the political spectrum, including our organization.

Sadly, though, when she wrote critiques of the Clintons in relation to the Whitewater affair, she was subjected to unfair targeting by the Clinton spin doctors. Such behavior by the White House in attacking  fair-minded reporters like Schmidt may not be illegal, but it is clearly  unethical. And such actions eventually lead to the repression and intimidation of reporters, which is evident in many non-democratic countries around the globe.

As the current White House scandal continues to unfold, I would hope that more journalists in Washington could find the courage of Ms. Schmidt. The integrity of a free press depends upon it.

Sincerely,

SCOTT LAUF
Executive Officer

Back To Top


The Washington Post
Letter to the Editor
1150 15th Street NW
Washington, DC 200

March 3, 1998

Letter to the Editor:

It was quite frightening to read the “Style” section profile of Mr. Terry Lenzner (“Private Eye or Public Enemy?”, March 2). As reported in Ken Ringle's in-depth article, Mr. Lenzner is described by his friends as a man who possesses a “dark side that's really scary”, “a volcanic intensity and deep-rooted insecurity” whose “scorched-earth tactics eventually turn people against him.”

It is clear that Terry Lenzner's “ethics” are elastic. Now seems like a good time to revisit the issue of the FBI files. It looks like a good bet to me that Mr. Lenzner might know something about this mystery.

Sincerely,

SCOTT LAUF
Executive Officer
Clinton Investigative Commission

Back To Top