Ron Brown Still Haunts the White House
By Scott Lauf
February 25, 1998
Before Monica Lewinsky overtook the national headlines in January 1998,
Washington was shaken over new revelations in the death of former
Commerce Secretary Ron Brown. A month earlier in December 1997, two
military medical examiners, Air Force Lt. Col. Steve Cogswell and U.S.
Army Lt. Col. David Hause, asserted that a suspicious skull wound on
Brown was the result of a .45 caliber gun, and not from the impact of
the plane crash. Their analysis was later corroborated by two other
colleagues with the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology. But before any
official inquiry could be started, the Lewinsky affair buried this
shocking revelation for more than a year. However, now that Mr.
Clinton’s impeachment trial is over, there is a renewed interest in
finding the truth about what really happened to Ron Brown….and why.
It's only about possible sabotage and the suspicion of murder.
Not since Secretary of Defense James Forrestal plummeted out of a 16th
story window at the Naval Hospital in Bethesda nearly 50 years ago has a
prominent presidential Cabinet Secretary died under such mysterious
circumstances. And while 1949 officialdom in Washington footnoted
Forrestal to irrelevance, no one should forget Ron Brown. For it is
Brown who was Clinton’s principal partner-in-crime --- from illegal
foreign fundraising to high-level bribery and racketeering. And it was
Brown, under investigation by 5 federal agencies, who was about to tell
all about the darkest secrets of President Clinton until his most
(un)timely death in 1996.
There are still serious questions which cannot be dismissed by
government authorities as conspiracy lore. And there are important
questions which have yet to be answered and may provide clues to the
events and motives surrounding the fateful plane crash in Dubrovnik,
Croatia, where Brown and 34 others apparently perished.
- What caused the plane to veer so far off course? The Air Force blames
pilot error. However, both pilots were well-experienced and the plane
was well-maintained with no mechanical problems.
- Did the outdated non-directional beacon (NDB) at Dubrovnik Airport
play a role? Due to the cloudy weather that day, the pilots were
reliant upon this beacon for landing. Strangely, Niko Jerkuic, the
chief maintenance officer in charge of the beacon, died of an apparent
self-inflicted gunshot three days after the crash and only moments
before he was to be interviewed by Air Force investigators. Mr.
Jerkuic’s family and colleagues do not believe he committed suicide.
- Was the landing manual doctored? The manual, made by
Jeppesen-Sanderson, Inc., details precise procedures for assisting
pilots on landing approach at Dubrovnik. Jeppesen is currently facing
civil legal action for negligence by the victims’ families. However,
the Air Force acknowledges that this manual was removed from the mishap
aircraft the night before and hand-delivered to the pilots who were
staying at a hotel in Zagreb.
- Were a “black box” and other critical items removed from the
wreckage? The Air Force maintains that Brown’s CT-43A aircraft was not
equipped with a flight data recorder, cockpit voice recorder, automatic
direction finding receiver, nor a global positioning system. It begs
the imagination to believe that this particular plane, which only weeks
before shuttled around Hillary Clinton and former Defense Secretary
William Perry, would not be equipped with these vital avionics
instruments.
- What happened to Shelly Kelly, a flight attendant who survived the
crash? Who carried her away from the crash site? And who arrived first
at the scene----Croatian or American military personnel? According to
the Air Force, Ms. Kelly was the “lone survivor” taken to local hospital
by the Croatians, but died en route from a broken neck sustained in the
crash. Independent reports, though, say she was airlifted by a U.S.
military helicopter and bled to death from a cut to her main femoral
artery.
With these troubling questions, along with the analyses of several
pathologists, it is not far-fetched to theorize that Brown and his
entourage were possible victims of a “planned accident,” and that Brown,
a possible survivor, may have been shot. Frankly, it is not premature
nor irresponsible to surmise such a possibility in light of the shocking
information already known. However, if there is another explanation to
support or quash such a theory, then a congressional or independent
investigation is in order.
Whatever transpired on that tragic day in Croatia, only a proper
investigation will tell us. The truth needs to be told----for the sake
of the victims’ families and for the American people.
|